Usenet Postings from Axel and Yobby - 2
Black Watch -- Iraquis, Iriquois - Confused?
Axel Klystron
Came across an interesting posting while browsing alt.circumcision as
one does..........
Enjoy Axel
From: Octogenarian85 (ocenturia...nospam)
>Is that the same GEORGE WASHINGTON [sic] who had tons of slaves?
I don't know if they counted them in tonnage? However yes that was the
same
great founding father of the greatest nation on EARTH. Upon his death
he freed
his slaves. Before his death they would have starved to death, or had
been
lynched bye a bunch of English/Scot decent torys. There for they would
not take
him up on his relieving them from indentured servitude. It is claimed
he used
white anglo tory trash for the dangerous jobs such as chopping down
big trees,
dredging swamps etc. As he loved his servants and would have been
loath to see
one of them befall an accident. He was also the same George Washington
that won
about every medal of chivalry that the Syphalic king george could
award a
british officer. He is also the same George Washington that gave Gen.
Burguyne
his charger/Horse after Burguyne stupidly led a regiment of his
majesties horse
into a french trap on a expadition around then fort William Henry now
known as
fort Ticonderoga.
The great traiter Benedict arnold walked into fort
William
Henry on Christmas day and the british cowards immediatly surrendered.
Later
the brave patriots of America lost the fort for lack of victuals,
relieve, arms
etc.
The filthy Scotch black watch only shamed all scotchman by
disemboweling
their own Brit decent American woman. Upon hearing this General mad
wayne
howard slaughtered the Iraqui's whom engaged with the scots in the
cowardly ,
wanton slaughter of woman!!!!!! He seiged fort Ticonderoga and told
the Black
watch he would send them all to hell. He kept his word by personaly
dualing
every scotch and brit soldier captured outside the fortress!!!!!!!!
There after he chopped the said scot/English dogs head off and lobbed it into fort
Ticonderoga to show the Iraqui's that their Scot/English allies were
cowards
and would never come out of the fortress and give battle.
True to his
word he
eventualy slaughtered 3 to 4 thousand scotch watch whence he took the
fort,
along with an unknown amount of Iraqui's.
General mad wayne Howard himself slaughtered every scot/brit/and
Iraqui he
could. Finaly his own officers and local ministers begged and
beseeched him to
give quarter to the Black watch. He gave quarter to the regular brit
dragoons
and the Indians. However he would give no quarter to a scot as he
claimed he
would not...... out of christianity his own men would hide scots or
allow them
to flee.
The great American patriot General mad wayne Howard destroyed the
black watch
and their barbarity of killing unarmed woman, civilians,
non-combatants,
Catholic priest, protestant ministers and their the scot watchs
specialty
disemboweling pregnant christian woman.
The scot watch was to later add more shame if that's possible by
picking up
their cowardly habits in the Carolina's were again the great patriots
of
America gave them no qaurter.
Octogenarian85
<<0>>
6 Dec 2004
From: "Fish 'n' Chisps"
Subject: Re: Black Watch -- Iraquis, Iriquois - Confused?
"Axel Klystron" <Axel> wrote in message
> Came across an interesting posting while browsing alt.circumcision as
> one does..........
> Enjoy Axel
> From: Octogenarian37
<snip stupid merkin>
> Octogenarian37
During the French and Indian War, at the first battle of Fort Ticonderoga
(1758) the regiment lost over half of its men in assault. At that time they
were already officially recognized as a Royal regiment. The second battalion
of the Black Watch was sent to the Caribbean where they saw action at
Havana, Martinique and Guadeloupe. After the losses of Ticonderoga, the two
battalions were consolidated in New York.
Between 1758 and 1767 it served in America and later, during the American
Revolutionary War. The regiment was involved in the defeat of George
Washington in the Battle of Long Island.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Watch
<<0>>
Alasdair
26 Nov 2004,
Newsgroups: uk.local.glasgow
From: "Alasdair"
Subject: Re: Absinthé aka The Green Fairy. Looking for retailer.
don't know offhand but when I have seen it its expensive !
Alasdair
w
ww.digitalmistake.co.uk
"Timo" <timpa... wrote in message
- Show quoted text -
> Any one know a shop, deli, or other out-let where I can buy this
> aperitif in or around Glasgow or Edinburgh?
> Berni
<<0>>
Major ChrisB
28 Nov 2004,
Subject: Re: Absinthé aka The Green Fairy. Looking for retailer.
"Timo"
> Any one know a shop, deli, or other out-let where I can buy this
> aperitif in or around Glasgow or Edinburgh?
the best absinthe in the world can be imported from greenfairy.org but it
around 60quid a bottle. You can buy absinthium in Asda and Tesco but it's
got no thujon rating....just lots of alcohol. The 1776 on greenfairy.org is
the brand of choice
<<0>>
Alex
29 Nov 2004,
Subject: Re: Absinthé aka The Green Fairy. Looking for retailer.
You will get absinthe at the parkgate supermarket on Balgrfayhill road,
springburn , Glasgow.
I noticed it on the shelf last night quite a surprise as i thought it was
classed as an illegal drug!!!
"Major Chris D"
> "Timos"
wrote in message
> > Any one know a shop, deli, or other out-let where I can buy this
> > aperitif in or around Glasgow or Edinburgh?
> the best absinthe in the world can be imported from greenfairy.org but it
> around 60quid a bottle. You can buy absinthium in Asda and Tesco but it's
> got no thujon rating....just lots of alcohol. The 1776 on greenfairy.org
is
> the brand of choice
<<0>>
Major ChrisB
30 Nov 2004From: "Major Chris D "
Subject: Re: Absinthé aka The Green Fairy. Looking for retailer.
"Alex" askfo...@Coldcrapp.com> wrote in message
You will get absinthe at the parkgate supermarket on Balgrfayhill road,
> springburn , Glasgow.
> I noticed it on the shelf last night quite a surprise as i thought it was
> classed as an illegal drug!!!
not in the UK, Spain, Czech Republic and Belgium or something....
dunno about anywhere else....
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
30 Nov 2004
Subject: Re: Absinthé aka The Green Fairy. Looking for retailer.
"Major ChrisB" -remo...> wrote in message > "Alex" <askfo...@Coldcrapp.com> wrote in message
> > You will get absinthe at the parkgate supermarket on Balgrfayhill road,
> > springburn , Glasgow.
> > I noticed it on the shelf last night quite a surprise as i thought it was
> > classed as an illegal drug!!!
> not in the UK, Spain, Czech Republic and Belgium or something....
> dunno about anywhere else....
burble burble neurotoxin drool brain cells deid awfy deid lovvverly
greeeeen stuff. nae shrt trm merymy hlep me pishen pishen pishen --
worse than meths drool drool burble thujon maks ye frgit.
Axel
//
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
22 Nov 2004,
Subject: Re: The UN vs The US
Roedy Green www.mindprod.com. wrote in message > On 21 Nov 2004 02:53:56 -0800, Axel (Axel Klystron) wrote
> or quoted :
> >My attempt at irony must have been a bit too convincing if mr Green missed it -
> Irony is tricky on the net. There are so many kooks, even the
> craziest assertions are made in earnest. Then there is the great
> Canadian tradition of leg pulling, which often involves mutually
> pretending not to notice irony. See
> http://mindprod.com/jgloss/legpulling.html
Will try to do better next time
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
7 Nov 2004,
Subject: Re: Election Day: Stephen Hawking to Lead Anti-War Protest
"John of Aix" <j.mur...@nospamlibertysurf.fr> wrote in message
- Show quoted text -
> ZZBunker wrote:
>
> "John of Aix" <j.mur...@nospamlibertysurf.fr> wrote in message
>
>> ZZBunker wrote:
> >>> Well, you can tell the idiots in Tralagar though, that we
> >>> *already* tried and failed with Britian's moronic
> >>> Newton Chair/ Bertrand Russell retard-wave solution to
> >>> World Peace in *1948*, when the MORONS created Israeli,
> >>> and Saudia Lawerence of Arabia and their omniscient,
> >>> and always present Commie, France meets Russia
> >>> in the Finals, Delegation to the Chinese-occupied
> >>> UN Hotel from their remnents of
> >>> Einstein, Elevator, Moron, and Idiots Ltd Inc.
> >> Could you translate this into English?
> > For the English, there is now and always been
Heavy metal poisoning and strokes affecting speech centres can affect
speech and ideation. 'Sounds' very like a stroke victim to me.
Axel Klystron
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
6 Nov 2004
Subject: Re: Tracking Evangelist Christianism #2 Anti-Environmentalism
- Show quoted text -
irrit... (Maria) wrote in message
1982
'...when President Reagan's first secretary of the interior, James
Watt, told the U.S. Congress that protecting natural resources was
unimportant in light of the imminent return of Jesus Christ. "God gave
us these things to use. After the last tree is felled, Christ will
come back," Watt said in public testimony that helped get him fired.'
Today's Christian fundamentalist politicians are more politically
savvy than Reagan's interior secretary was; you're unlikely to catch
them overtly attributing public-policy decisions to private religious
views. But their words and actions suggest that many share Watt's
beliefs. Like him, many Christian fundamentalists feel that concern
for the future of our planet is irrelevant, because it has no future.
They believe we are living in the End Time, when the son of God will
return, the righteous will enter heaven, and sinners will be condemned
to eternal hellfire. They may also believe, along with millions of
other Christian fundamentalists, that environmental destruction is not
only to be disregarded but actually welcomed -- even hastened -- as a
sign of the coming Apocalypse.
[...]
People under the spell of such potent prophecies cannot be expected to
worry about the environment. Why care about the earth when the
droughts, floods, and pestilence brought by ecological collapse are
signs of the Apocalypse foretold in the Bible? Why care about global
climate change when you and yours will be rescued in the Rapture? And
why care about converting from oil to solar when the same God who
performed the miracle of the loaves and fishes can whip up a few
billion barrels of light crude with a Word?
[...]
To understand how the Christian right worldview is shaping and even
fueling congressional anti-environmentalism, consider two influential
born-again lawmakers: House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chair James Inhofe
(R-Okla.).
DeLay, who has considerable control over the agenda in the House, has
called for "march[ing] forward with a Biblical worldview" in U.S.
politics, reports Peter Perl in The Washington Post Magazine. DeLay
wants to convert America into a "God centered" nation whose government
promotes prayer, worship, and the teaching of Christian values.
Inhofe, the Senate's most outspoken environmental critic, is also
unwavering in his wish to remake America as a Christian state.
Speaking at the Christian Coalition's Road to Victory rally just
before the GOP sweep of the 2002 midterm elections, he promised the
faithful, "When we win this revolution in November, you'll be doing
the Lord's work, and He will richly bless you for it!"
Neither DeLay nor Inhofe include environmental protection in "the
Lord's work." Both have ranted against the EPA, calling it "the
Gestapo." DeLay has fought to gut the Clean Air and Endangered Species
acts. Last year, Inhofe invited a stacked-deck of fossil fuel-funded
climate-change skeptics to testify at a Senate hearing that climaxed
with him calling global warming "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on
the American people."
(M note - for anyone anxious that the above mentioned people are
driven purely by their pre-occupation with Armageddon, read on)
James Inhofe might be an environmentalist's worst nightmare. The
Oklahoma senator makes major policy decisions based on heavy corporate
and theological influences, flawed science, and probably an
apocalyptic worldview -- and he chairs the Senate Environment and
Public Works Committee.
That committee's links to corporate funders are both easier to trace
and more infamous than its ties to religious fundamentalism, and it's
true that the influence of money can scarcely be overstated. From 1999
to 2004, Inhofe received more than $588,000 from the fossil-fuel
industry, electric utilities, mining, and other natural-resource
interests, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Eight of
the nine other Republican members of Inhofe's committee received an
average of $408,000 per senator from the energy and natural resource
sector over the same period. By contrast, the eight committee
Democrats and one Independent came away with an average of just
$132,000 per senator from that same sector since 1999.
http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2004/10/27/scherer-christian/
http://www.theocracywatch.org/environment.htm
Life is a self-fulfilling prophecy
Axel Klystron
<<0>>
6 Nov 2004, 10:05
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc
(Axel Klystron)
6 Nov 2004 02:05:16 -0800
Sat 6 Nov 2004 10:05
Subject: Blair's son to join Black Watch
Rumours originating from the Westminster village suggest that Tony
Blair's son is likely to join one of the Scottish regiments, based in
Iraq.
The morale of the Black Watch regiment, who are currently based near
the town of Fallujah, is likely to be boosted by the news, should it
be true. Mr Blair, who is a great supporter of Mr Bush is known to
favour a military career for his sons. Or so the rumours go. Much of
the criticism that Blair has an attracted over the past year of so,
would probably evaporate if his son were to serve as a soldier on
active duty. No comments so far from other Labour politicians or the
opposition. We wait with interest comments from Mr Howard, the
opposition leader.
Axel Klystron
Reply Reply to author Forward
<<0>>
Robert Hendersson
6 Nov 2004,
Subject: Re: Blair's son to join Black Watch
In article <a731088.0411060205.6a8b0...@posting.google.com, Axel Klystron <Axel> writes
Rumours originating from the Westminster village suggest that Tony
Blair's son is likely to join one of the Scottish regiments, based in
Iraq.
The morale of the Black Watch regiment, who are currently based near
the town of Fallujah, is likely to be boosted by the news, should it
be true. Mr Blair, who is a great supporter of Mr Bush is known to
favour a military career for his sons. Or so the rumours go. Much of
the criticism that Blair has an attracted over the past year of so,
would probably evaporate if his son were to serve as a soldier on
active duty. No comments so far from other Labour politicians or the
opposition. We wait with interest comments from Mr Howard, the
opposition leader.
Splendid piece of satire. RH
Axel Klystron
--
Robert Hendersson
/
<<0>>
anton
6 Nov 2004,
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc
From: "anton"
Subject: Re: Blair's son to join Black Watch
"Axel Klystron" <Axel> wrote in message
..
Rumours originating from the Westminster village suggest that Tony
Blair's son is likely to join one of the Scottish regiments, based in
Iraq.
Nonsense.
The morale of the Black Watch regiment, who are currently based near
the town of Fallujah, is likely to be boosted by the news, should it
be true.
Really? Who says so? 'Sources close to' the Labour party?
Mr Blair, who is a great supporter of Mr Bush is known to
favour a military career for his sons.
CND member Blair? I don't think so. Though he does try to ape the Royal
Family, and joining the armed forces is de rigeur for them.
Or so the rumours go. Much of
the criticism that Blair has an attracted over the past year of so,
would probably evaporate if his son were to serve as a soldier on
active duty.
How long would the training period be? Given that a Blairkin is not
currently in the armed forces, how long would it take to be on 'active
service'?
No comments so far from other Labour politicians
or the
opposition. We wait with interest comments from Mr Howard, the
opposition leader.
I suspect that you'll wait a long time for comments on such a silly little
spinfest.
--
Anton
<<0>>
john browne
6 Nov 2004, 20:09
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc
From: "john browne" <dugd...Coldcrapp.com
Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:09:18 -0000
Sat 6 Nov 2004 20:09
Subject: Re: Blair's son to join Black Watch
"anton" <antonr...@SPAMbtinternet.com wrote in message
- Show quoted text -
> "Axel Klystron" <Axel> wrote in message
>> Rumours originating from the Westminster village suggest that Tony
>> Blair's son is likely to join one of the Scottish regiments, based in
>> Iraq.
> Nonsense.
>> The morale of the Black Watch regiment, who are currently based near
>> the town of Fallujah, is likely to be boosted by the news, should it
>> be true.
> Really? Who says so? 'Sources close to' the Labour party?
>> Mr Blair, who is a great supporter of Mr Bush is known to
>> favour a military career for his sons.
> CND member Blair? I don't think so. Though he does try to ape the Royal
> Family, and joining the armed forces is de rigeur for them.
>> Or so the rumours go. Much of
>> the criticism that Blair has an attracted over the past year of so,
>> would probably evaporate if his son were to serve as a soldier on
>> active duty.
> How long would the training period be? Given that a Blairkin is not
> currently in the armed forces, how long would it take to be on 'active
> service'?
>> No comments so far from other Labour politicians
>>or the
>> opposition. We wait with interest comments from Mr Howard, the
>> opposition leader.
> I suspect that you'll wait a long time for comments on such a silly little
> spinfest.
Fucking Hell Anton, did you forget your meds again?
It was a joke, geddit?
anton
<<0>>
6 Nov 2004, "anton"
Subject: Re: Blair's son to join Black Watch
"john brownie" <dugd...Coldcrapp.com> wrote in message
> > I suspect that you'll wait a long time for comments on such a silly
little
> > spinfest.
> Fucking Hell Anton, did you forget your meds again?
> It was a joke, geddit?
OK. Overwork, not lack of anything in the bloodstream.
--
Anton
<<0>>
john browne
7 Nov 2004
Subject: Re: Blair's son to join Black Watch
"anton" <antonr...@SPAMbtinternet.com> wrote in message
- Show quoted text -
> "john browne" <dugd...Coldcrapp.com> wrote in message
>> > I suspect that you'll wait a long time for comments on such a silly
> little
>> > spinfest.
>> Fucking Hell Anton, did you forget your meds again?
>> It was a joke, geddit?
> OK. Overwork, not lack of anything in the bloodstream.
> --
> Anton
Nice to see you back to your usual self old mate:)
<<0>>
Jim Wilson
25 Oct 2004,
Subject: Re: Kerry-Edwards to Attack Iran
"Sam Sloan" <s...@ishipress.com> wrote in message
> Americans have a lot of antipathy towards Iran because of the hostage
> crisis which ended in 1981
Those of us with long memories certainly do. The Ayatollah Khomeini and the
hostage-taking "students" utterly humiliated Jimmy Carter and the American
people for over a year. It was a severe blow to American prestige in the
world and no doubt served to encourage the Islamists a great deal.
and because anti-American rhetoric coming
> out of Iran. However, rhetoric is just rhetoric.
Not when it pumps up people who kill us, it isn't.
Until 1979, Iran was
> the staunchest ally the US had anywhere in the world.
That doesn't mean much in a world in which today's allies are tomorrow's
enemies, and vice versa.
The political
> upheaval in Iran caused the hostage crisis, which has cemented the
anti-Iranian views of many Americans, even though that crisis ended
relatively quickly and without any loss of life.
They humiliated us for over a year because of the weakness of the American
president. To allow any group to get away with something as heinous as what
the Iranians did in Tehran is like painting a big sign on your ass that says
"kick me." It was unforgivable.
> Edwards spoke openly about attacking Iran. Iran has never attacked or
> threatened anyone. Iran poses no threat, none what ever, to any other
> country.
Nonsense. We don't need Edwards in the VP slot, but we sure shouldn't kid
ourselves about Iran. They remain a serious threat to our national security
and certainly deserve their well-earned status as part of the "axis of
evil."
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
1 Nov 2004,
Subject: Re: Kerry-Edwards to Attack Iran
- Show quoted text -
"Jim Wilson" <cir...@citlink.net> wrote in message > "Sam Sloan" <s...@ishipress.com> wrote in message
.
> > Americans have a lot of antipathy towards Iran because of the hostage
> > crisis which ended in 1981
> Those of us with long memories certainly do. The Ayatollah Khomeini and the
> hostage-taking "students" utterly humiliated Jimmy Carter and the American
> people for over a year. It was a severe blow to American prestige in the
> world and no doubt served to encourage the Islamists a great deal.
> and because anti-American rhetoric coming
> > out of Iran. However, rhetoric is just rhetoric.
> Not when it pumps up people who kill us, it isn't.
> Until 1979, Iran was
> > the staunchest ally the US had anywhere in the world.
> That doesn't mean much in a world in which today's allies are tomorrow's
> enemies, and vice versa.
> The political
> > upheaval in Iran caused the hostage crisis, which has cemented the
> > anti-Iranian views of many Americans, even though that crisis ended
> > relatively quickly and without any loss of life.
> They humiliated us for over a year because of the weakness of the American
> president. To allow any group to get away with something as heinous as what
> the Iranians did in Tehran is like painting a big sign on your ass that says
> "kick me." It was unforgivable.
> > Edwards spoke openly about attacking Iran. Iran has never attacked or
> > threatened anyone. Iran poses no threat, none what ever, to any other
> > country.
> Nonsense. We don't need Edwards in the VP slot, but we sure shouldn't kid
> ourselves about Iran. They remain a serious threat to our national security
> and certainly deserve their well-earned status as part of the "axis of
> evil."
We seem to have poor recall of the enormity of what we did in
overthrowing Mr Mossadegh in 1953, I wonder did the sixty billion
barrels of Iranian oil cloud our memories? Selective history is
dangerous.
Axel
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
31 Oct 2004
Subject: Bush's Fundie friends - As dangerous as AlQaida?
Mr G W Bush has found religion and it seems to have helped him to get
into the White House and win votes, but has his conversion made the
world a safer place?
Between the Moslems and the Christian societies which one has produced
the most dangerous fundamentalists?
Ronald Reagans Contras murdered at least, 55,000 people, AlQaida has
killed fewer than 5000 people.
Ronald Reagan was put in power, by The Christian Right. While Ronnie
was conducting his prayer meetings, his good friend John Negroponte
was building, funding and empowering the Contras and their death
squads in Nicaragua, it was okay to kill the godless socialists and
communists, the atrocities almost never reached western mass media.
The hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, who have died since the
application of UN sanctions and the invasion, they too rarely get a
mention, but of course they worship a different God! We are not even
bothering to keep count of the Arab dead!!
How many of the world's problems are traceable to extremist religions,
dogmas and mythologies? Oh, and I forgot the Zionists, they too have
added fuel to the flames.
My opinion is that the Christians have done more harm. Probably sixty
forty with the Moslems crazies having the most potential for
troublemaking, perhaps 55 to 45 percentiles.
Axel
<<0>>
Roedy Green
31 Oct 2004,
Subject: Re: Bush's Fundie friends - As dangerous as AlQaida?
On 31 Oct 2004 10:28:38 -0800, Axel (Axel Klystron) wrote
or quoted :
>Mr G W Bush has found religion and it seems to have helped him to get
>into the White House and win votes, but has his conversion made the
>world a safer place?
The Christian Reconstructionists are much more dangerous than Al
Qaeda. Two Christian Reconstructionist brothers control 80% of the
voting machines. Al Qaeda controls none.
The Reconstructionists are just as dedicated as any Muslim fanatic to
destroying democracy and installing a theocracy.
"It's not the voting that's democracy; it's the counting."
~ Tom Stoppard, playwright
A vote for Bush is a vote to expand torture, homosexual sexual abuse, child rape and child murder in Iraq.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
See http://mindprod.com/iraq.html photos of Bush's war crimes
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
23 Oct 2004
Subject: Re: Court Warning On "Racist Pets" !
I once terrified a camel in Saudi Arabia. The poor wee animal had
probably never seen a Scotsman before. Really, though it was
terrified of me and had to be restrained by its owner who told me that
it was scared of Europeans - for no aparent reason -
Axel
- Show quoted text -
"Ted" <T...@Tednet.com> wrote in message > "Chris Zero " <Chri...@postmeister.co.uk> wrote in message
> > http://www.britishnumptyparty.org.uk
> > Pet owners have been warned that they could be held responsible for the
> > racist actions of their animals under Britain's anti-hate legislation.
> > This warning came after astonishing scenes at a English magistrates court
> > earlier this week. "Trigger", a former brewery dray horse of some 12 years
> > but who now entertains children who are able to pet him and ride on him at
> > fetes and fairs was brought before the court for alleged racist behaviour,
> <snip>
> I've heard that donkeys, as a group are guilty of
> institutional racism. With those who work Blackpool beach being notorious
> offenders.
<<0>>
Moral Conscience
23 Oct 2004
Subject: Re: Court Warning On "Racist Pets" !
Axel Klystron wrote:
> I once terrified a camel in Saudi Arabia. The poor wee animal had
> probably never seen a Scotsman before. Really, though it was
> terrified of me and had to be restrained by its owner who told me that
> it was scared of Europeans - for no aparent reason -
> Axel
Maybe it was the fact that you wore no underwear under the kilt :)
- Show quoted text -
> "Ted" <T...@Tednet.com> wrote in message
>>"Chris X" <Chri...@postmeister.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/2004_oct/news_oct33.htm
>>>Pet owners have been warned that they could be held responsible for the
>>>racist actions of their animals under Britain's anti-hate legislation.
>>>This warning came after astonishing scenes at a English magistrates court
>>>earlier this week. "Trigger", a former brewery dray horse of some 12 years
>>>but who now entertains children who are able to pet him and ride on him at
>>>fetes and fairs was brought before the court for alleged racist behaviour,
>> <snip>
>> I've heard that donkeys, as a group are guilty of
>>institutional racism. With those who work Blackpool beach being notorious
>>offenders.
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
23 Oct 2004, 11:51
Subject: Scots and Arabs - Permanent estrangement?
I have a dreadful feeling that the sending of the Black Watch up to
Baghdad will result in serious damage, not only to the reputation of
the regiment but to the Scots as a whole, one, which is permanent and
irreversible. The considerable investment and effort to win hearts and
minds will be rendered useless overnight by this folly.
Peacekeeping, is which is what the duties in Basra seem to be mainly
about is not ignoble, but will the move north be accompanied by a
shift to less savoury activities. What seems to be planned for the
Scots is nothing more than assisting with a bloody assault on the
city?
My perception is that not only Arabs and Muslims but also the rest of
the world will see Scottish soldiers as oppressors and a core element
in the deeply immoral invasion of the country.
Axel Klystron
<<0>>
Scotty
23 Oct 2004, 15:29
From: "Scotty" <d...@thingymagig.com>
Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:29:53 GMT
Sat 23 Oct 2004 15:29
Subject: Re: Scots and Arabs - Permanent estrangement?
"Axel Klystron" <Axel> wrote in message
- Show quoted text -
> I have a dreadful feeling that the sending of the Black Watch up to
> Baghdad will result in serious damage, not only to the reputation of
> the regiment but to the Scots as a whole, one, which is permanent and
> irreversible. The considerable investment and effort to win hearts and
> minds will be rendered useless overnight by this folly.
> Peacekeeping, is which is what the duties in Basra seem to be mainly
> about is not ignoble, but will the move north be accompanied by a
> shift to less savoury activities. What seems to be planned for the
> Scots is nothing more than assisting with a bloody assault on the
> city?
> My perception is that not only Arabs and Muslims but also the rest of
> the world will see Scottish soldiers as oppressors and a core element
> in the deeply immoral invasion of the country.
> Axel Klystron
I was at the Black Watch http://www.theblackwatch.co.uk/
SOS Save oor Sogers rally today.
Many people exclaimed that oor boys were just going as cannon fodder in the
bad bits to save the merKins from harm. (See election usOFa)
Scotty
<<0>>
Country Loon
23 Oct 2004
Subject: Re: Scots and Arabs - Permanent estrangement?
"Scotty" <d...@thingymagig.com> wrote in message
- Show quoted text -
> "Axel Klystron" <Axel> wrote in message
> > I have a dreadful feeling that the sending of the Black Watch up to
> > Baghdad will result in serious damage, not only to the reputation of
> > the regiment but to the Scots as a whole, one, which is permanent and
> > irreversible. The considerable investment and effort to win hearts and
> > minds will be rendered useless overnight by this folly.
> > Peacekeeping, is which is what the duties in Basra seem to be mainly
> > about is not ignoble, but will the move north be accompanied by a
> > shift to less savoury activities. What seems to be planned for the
> > Scots is nothing more than assisting with a bloody assault on the
> > city?
> > My perception is that not only Arabs and Muslims but also the rest of
> > the world will see Scottish soldiers as oppressors and a core element
> > in the deeply immoral invasion of the country.
> > Axel Klystron
> I was at the Black Watch http://www.theblackwatch.co.uk/
> SOS Save oor Sogers rally today.
> Many people exclaimed that oor boys were just going as cannon fodder in
the
> bad bits to save the merKins from harm. (See election usOFa)
they are only following orders
Country Loon
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
23 Oct 2004
Subject: Re: Scotland is property of England ! ! !
- Show quoted text -
"allan conochie" <a...@EASYNUT.CO.UK> wrote in message
> "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <growill...Coldcrapp.com> wrote in message
.
> > "allan connochie" <a...@EASYNET.CO.UK
> wrote in message
..
> > > "Karl-Hugo Weesberg" <netspid...@lycos.com> wrote in message
> > > > The Scottish are just a slave-race created for uranium mining in the
> > > > Scottish mountains and the English are their masters!
> > > > So the Scottish must suck English clocks and work for their English
> > > > masters or die!
> > > Good trolls bring you in as you feel they are misguided folk who can be
> > > reasoned with. It's only after corresponding for a short while that you
> > > sense they are arsing about. Bad trolls are very obvious and you are
> one
> > > seriously bad troll.
> > Gosh! Do you really think he's one of those troll thingies?!
> > You know I do believe you could be right - and there was me thinking he
> was
> > a schoolkid on a 'project'.
> > I don't care what everyone else says about you Allan - *I* think you're
> > smart.
> Well that's more than the mother-in-law thinks of me!!! Even if you are
> kidding.
> Allan
I think he is one seriously *wicked* troll. No collection would be any
good without one such. If there is such a thing as an Aristocracy then
our friend must qualify. I feel truly humbled in such company
Axel
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
26 Sep 2004
Subject: Re: Iran girls forced to work in Pakistani brothels
"Neil Kashmiri - Hindu Sikh"
<neil_kash...Coldcrapp.com
> wrote in message
> Probably become human bombs to kill Americans!
> S. L'Gree <put_you...@ckintoitboy.com> wrote in message
> > No doubt they'll now become suicide bombers in order to redeem their
> > families' "honor"
Joubin got it about right, such wonderful decent people contributing
to this topic. How many Iranian terrorists have we had? Was it 15 or
16 in the twin towers bombing?
Axel
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
26 Sep 2004
Subject: Blair - MORE LIES - IRAN & SYRIA
BLAIR - MORE LIES - IRAN & SYRIA
Mr Blair recently had his own and his friends bacon saved in Najaf by
an Iranian Mullah, Ayatollah Sistani, but despite this he going along
with Bush's scapegoating of Iran and wildly exaggerating the support
that Muqtada al Sadr gets from his support base in Iran. It is a lie
to suggest, as he has done, that the Mullahs support al Sadr, the vast
majority are behind Sistani. Blair regularly gets away with
unchallenged lies, like many accomplished dissemblers he chooses his
territory and timing very carefully.
He seems to me to be cynically trying to cash in on the Bigley hostage
problem. Appears to be to be bent on stirring up even more trouble and
hatred. Attack and possibly even invasion are steadily becoming more
of a possibility. Count the number of times Iran is mentioned in
Blair's speeches over the next few weeks, I expect the frequency to
steadily increase.
We are seriously at risk of being drawn in to a Middle East-wide
conflict engineered by the dangerous little coterie of ‘fruitcake
neocons' using their ‘in' with Rice, Rummy, Chaney et al.
The damage to Britain inflicted by Tony's taking us in to Iraq is as
nothing to what will happen to our standing and reputation, not to
mention our prosperity, if we are drawn into helping the fruitcakes
implement the flawed plan of Finlandizing the Middle East.
This batch of politicians seem to be dangerously ignorant of
international affairs, even Kennedy, the least stupid of the crop
regularly reveals his lack of knowledge of what is really out there. I
suspect that we are powerless to stop ourselves from being drawn in to
a never-ending conflict. We, the British are no different from the
people of the ME region in that respect. Being historically ignorant
and untravelled seems to be necessary qualifications for our leaders.
Those who are feeding the flames may think they are getting on top of
a situation, but imposed rule almost never has long-term stability -
as the Russians and the British before them found out in Afghanistan.
Blowback is inevitable. We cannot get out and we should not stay in
Iraq. It would be immoral to abandon the Iraqis to total anarchy and
just run, however our imposed structures have no legitimacy. There is
very little that we can do in the situation that Mr Blair has caused.
It will be decades before we can erase the harm of Blair's follies.
The highest priority is now to stop the hollow man from doing more
damage. Prevention is better than cure and we MUST SAY NO to further
disastrous escapades with Tony's loose cannon friends. It is our duty
to get the man out of office at the first possible opportunity. The
alternative is tens, possibly hundreds of thousands of deaths, some of
them our own people.
Axel
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
4 Sep 2004, 09:10
Subject: Bell - "Thieving Scottish Scoundrel"
Mr Bell certainly was an outstanding pioneer of the telephone and
there is plenty of evidence to show that he was aware of earlier
experimenters. His initial patent is titled "Telegraphy" and the
transmission of speech and sounds seems secondary to the main topic of
the transmission of tones. He seems to have had a desire to achieve
the synthesis of sounds by combining multiple tones and describes his
apparatus as being capable of acieving this. A fair amount of maths is
included but what is being described seems to be considerably more
than a basic telephonic system.
His second patent is more of the same, tones and filters with little
reference to a simple telephonic system. Incidently in both documents
he only claims Improvements to telegraphy and it seems to me that his
method of producing an audio frequency varying current from battery
and an electrode immersed in a liquid was the first active telephonic
system as opposed to all of the earlier passive ones. He seems to have
combined both telegraphy and passive inductive telephony.
His patent clearly distinguishes between "vibratory or undulatory" as
opposed to merely "intermittent or pulsatory currents". Analogue and
digital first clearly distinguished? He also seems to be fighting the
scientists desire to further investigate harmonic phenomena and
getting working telephone systems off the ground - or maybe I am
second guessing the man.
I do not wish to detract from the achievements of earlier pioneers but
it does seem that there was an inventive step in producing an 'active'
system and he was clearly justified in patenting his "Improvements"
Axel
<<0>>
Axel
8 Aug 2004
Subject: British food
The quality of supermarket organic food according to my taste buds
appears to be deteriorating. I find that the once-noticable
differential in many of the organic products are no longer so obvious
to me. It could be that I am losing my sense of tase with all the
chillies I eat these days.
Marks and Spencers too seem to have lost the edge they had on the
other high street stores food shelves. I was annoyed that some
allegedly quality food contained TFAs despite the blizzard of warnings
coming from medical authorities. They failed to respond to me when I
sent off this e-mail to them about three weeks ago:-
Dear Sirs
RE: TFAs in Marks and Spencer products
I recently purchased a pack of Marks and Spencer Double Devon Butter
Toffee. The toffees were delicious and I am still enjoying them. My
e-mail is not all praise, however and I would bring to your attention
a couple of disqueting facts.
The first is a matter that could be interpreted as incorrect
representation, the description on the label runs like so -- Double
Devon Butter Toffee A smooth butter toffee made fronm the finest
ingredients to a traditional Devonshire recipe.
On the reverse of the packet a similar message appears, this time "A
SMOOTH BUTTER TOFFEE MADE FROM THE FINEST INGREDIENTS TO A TRADITIONAL
DEVONSHIRE RECIPE" Under this message the ingredients are listed. One
item caught my eye, it was Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil, Even in the USA
where consumers accept very poor environmental and food standards the
large food companies are eliminating TFAs such as the hydrogenated
oils. Campbell foods has already done so and they do not claim or have
an image anywhere near to M and S's standards.
In Britain today there are many people who are simultaneously obese
and malnourished and allowing TFAs to be included in your food
products is contributing to the problem.
EFAs (Essential Fatty Acids) are essential to our wellbeing, however
TFAs (Trans Fatty Acids) are artery clogging, saturated fats usually
found in processed foods and those containing hydrogenated oils or
margarine, or baked goods. Trans Fatty Acids interfere with the normal
function of EFAs. These are actually preventing proper nutrition and
thus causing harm to your customers. TFAs can not ever be described as
a "finest ingredient".
This message is sent in the hope that I can highlight a failure in
your system not as a general complaint.
In addition to the TFAs problem you have at least one other serious
additive issue that I suspect that you are not aware of but I will
wait until I hear from you regarding the TFA business before I detail
it.
Regards
The other matter that I was going to bring to their attention was the
use of Aluminum (Aluminium) based raising agents in muffins etc.
Aluminum is an extremely nasty and persistent nuerotoxin and is used
in low cost low quality mass-produced foods and it worries me to think
that allegedly quality food producers use it in their products.
Axel
<<0>>
Fx199
8 Aug 2004
Subject: Re: British food
>Even in the USA
>where consumers accept very poor environmental and food standards
When in doubt, insult the USA
Fx199
<<0>>
sf sfl
9 Aug 2004
Subject: Re: British food
On 8 Aug 2004 Axel (Axel
Klystron) wrote:
> The quality of supermarket organic food according to my taste buds
> appears to be deteriorating. I find that the once-noticable
> differential in many of the organic products are no longer so obvious
> to me.
In my dreams it would be because commercial organic growing
practices growing practices are coming closer to that of
back yard growers.
> It could be that I am losing my sense of tase with all the
> chillies I eat these days.
Frankly, I've only tasted an occasional difference.
Probably because commercial growers can't pick perfectly
ripe tomatoes (or any other vegetable for that matter) and
sell them that day.
sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments
<<0>>
subject changed to "Organic tomatoes
xyzabob
9 Aug 2004
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: xyzbod
Mon 9 Aug 2004
Subject: Re: Organic tomatoes (was: British food
Axel Klystron wrote:
> The quality of supermarket organic food according to my taste buds
> appears to be deteriorating. I find that the once-noticable
> differential in many of the organic products are no longer so obvious
> to me. It could be that I am losing my sense of tase with all the
> chillies I eat these days.
You are confusing "organic" with "vine ripened". The organic tomatoes
are probably picked green and ripened with ethylene as they are shipped
just like any other supermarket tomato. (Organic ethylene from an
overripe pineapple, perhaps.)
Bob
subject changed to "British food" by Axel Klystron
Axel Klystron
10 Aug 2004
Subject: Re: British food
f... (Fx199) wrote in messagem04.aol.com>...
> >Even in the USA
> >where consumers accept very poor environmental and food standards
> When in doubt, insult the USA
In my defence I would say that I was not attacking America, I was
attacking Marks and Spencers, I was using a rather obvious carbuncle
on Uncle Sams nose to club them with. Americans are even more
apathetic than we, the Brits are,regarding the environment and being
put upon by government, big business and the media (If Fox News can be
thus described!!!!HaHa??????).
I rather like Yankydoodlies but would prefer that they got their act
together and tried to join up with the rest of the world before it is
too late (yes there is such a thing as the rest of the world).
Restoring America's standing in the world should be a priority for
every US citizen.
Axel
<<0>>
Wayne
10 Aug 2004,
Subject: Re: British food
Axel (Axel Klystron) wrote in
- Show quoted text -
> f... (Fx199) wrote in message
>> >Even in the USA
>> >where consumers accept very poor environmental and food standards
>> When in doubt, insult the USA
> In my defence I would say that I was not attacking America, I was
> attacking Marks and Spencers, I was using a rather obvious carbuncle
> on Uncle Sams nose to club them with. Americans are even more
> apathetic than we, the Brits are,regarding the environment and being
> put upon by government, big business and the media (If Fox News can be
> thus described!!!!HaHa??????).
> I rather like Yankydoodlies but would prefer that they got their act
> together and tried to join up with the rest of the world before it is
> too late (yes there is such a thing as the rest of the world).
> Restoring America's standing in the world should be a priority for
> every US citizen.
You're still doing it, David. Better quit while you're ahead.
--
Wayne in Phoenix
*If there's a nit to pick, some nitwit will pick it.
*A mind is a terrible thing to lose.
<<0>>
Axel Klystron
8 Aug 2004,
Subject: British food
The quality of supermarket organic food according to my taste buds
appears to be deteriorating. I find that the once-noticable
differential in many of the organic products are no longer so obvious
to me. It could be that I am losing my sense of tase with all the
chillies I eat these days.
Marks and Spencers too seem to have lost the edge they had on the
other high street stores food shelves. I was annoyed that some
allegedly quality food contained TFAs despite the blizzard of warnings
coming from medical authorities. They failed to respond to me when I
sent off this e-mail to them about three weeks ago:-
Dear Sirs
RE: TFAs in Marks and Spencer products
I recently purchased a pack of Marks and Spencer Double Devon Butter
Toffee. The toffees were delicious and I am still enjoying them. My
e-mail is not all praise, however and I would bring to your attention
a couple of disqueting facts.
The first is a matter that could be interpreted as incorrect
representation, the description on the label runs like so -- Double
Devon Butter Toffee A smooth butter toffee made fronm the finest
ingredients to a traditional Devonshire recipe.
On the reverse of the packet a similar message appears, this time "A
SMOOTH BUTTER TOFFEE MADE FROM THE FINEST INGREDIENTS TO A TRADITIONAL
DEVONSHIRE RECIPE" Under this message the ingredients are listed. One
item caught my eye, it was Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil, Even in the USA
where consumers accept very poor environmental and food standards the
large food companies are eliminating TFAs such as the hydrogenated
oils. Campbell foods has already done so and they do not claim or have
an image anywhere near to M and S's standards.
In Britain today there are many people who are simultaneously obese
and malnourished and allowing TFAs to be included in your food
products is contributing to the problem.
EFAs (Essential Fatty Acids) are essential to our wellbeing, however
TFAs (Trans Fatty Acids) are artery clogging, saturated fats usually
found in processed foods and those containing hydrogenated oils or
margarine, or baked goods. Trans Fatty Acids interfere with the normal
function of EFAs. These are actually preventing proper nutrition and
thus causing harm to your customers. TFAs can not ever be described as
a "finest ingredient".
This message is sent in the hope that I can highlight a failure in
your system not as a general complaint.
In addition to the TFAs problem you have at least one other serious
additive issue that I suspect that you are not aware of but I will
wait until I hear from you regarding the TFA business before I detail
it.
Regards
The other matter that I was going to bring to their attention was the
use of Aluminum (Aluminium) based raising agents in muffins etc.
Aluminum is an extremely nasty and persistent nuerotoxin and is used
in low cost low quality mass-produced foods and it worries me to think
that allegedly quality food producers use it in their products.
Axel
//
<<0>>
Axel
5 Oct 2003
Subject: The Blessed Tony's Charge sheet
Blair - Guilty of:
·Failing to send a cheque to the Iraqi PhD student whose material was
filched for the Dossier.
· Further destabilising the Middle East.
· Tarnishing and trashing Britain's good name
· Damaging United Nations and Kofi Annan.
· Damaging European harmony.
· Putting back the solving of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict.
· Damaging the progress in the development of International Law. (illegal
war)
· Putting back the possibility of the development of true democracy in
Iraq by 50 years minimum.
· Driving and bearing responsibility for the outing Dr David Kelly and
ultimately his suicide.
· Ignorant of the history of poodling along with US in Middle Eastern
adventures.- e.g. Project Boot also supported the CIA's Operation Ajax.
· Lying to the people of these lands.
· Giving licence to despotic regimes who have used the "War against
Terror" as a pretext to attack dissenters resulting in tens of thousands of
deaths, torture and repression.
· Allowing the supposed friend , the USA to inflict enormous damage on
herself by going to war.
. etc. etc. etc.
Any more suggestions
Axel
<<0>>
Axel
5 Oct 2003, 00:19
Subject: Re: Who here likes Tony Blair?
I detest Tony Blair. I think he is a pathological liar. To my mind he is guilty
of many things including;
1. Failing to send a cheque to the Iraqi PhD student whose material was filched
for the Dossier.
2. Tarnishing and trashing Britain's good name
Any more suggestions.
I have a long list but will keep it and send some more as a separate topic:
Axel
<<0>>
Home - Usenet 1